- Why A “Child Safety Pledge”?
- What is the Child Safety Pledge?
- How does the pledge work?
- Why not just ask the organizations to do it themselves?
- What is the objective of the Child Safety Pledge?
- Why will a funder pledge strategy work?
- What do you mean by “Policies” or “Standards”?
- Why not just determine the policies and procedures for organizations?
- If this is a community-wide problem, doesn’t it need a community-wide answer?
- How will organizations comply with the Pledge?
- How do I know if an organization complies with the pledge requirements?
- How will funders be certain organizations they support are in compliance?
- Won’t compliance require money and resources for the organizations affected?
- where will organizations get the expertise and support to become compliant?
- If all it takes is an organization asserting that they have adequate policies and procedures, won’t some organizations make the assertion but not back up their words with actions?
- How do I take the Pledge, or get my peers and community institutions to do so?
- Doesn’t that mean the pledge is entirely dependent upon funders exercising oversight to determine and assure compliance?
- What is the timeline for launching the strategy?
- How does the stakeholder group fit into the overall strategy?
- What is the exact wording of the Pledge and when will it take effect?
- What happens after the pledge language has been finalized?
- How will the pledge strategy get advanced?
The Child Safety Pledge is a philanthropist-driven effort to address the difficult and ongoing problem of the sexual abuse of children who are in the care of Jewish organizations. Despite increasing awareness of the problem, and ongoing media coverage of new incidents, nothing is being done at a systemic level to reduce the risk of sexual abuse of minors or to assure organizations deal with the issue appropriately when it does happen.
The Child Safety Pledge is a strategic effort by Jewish funders to ensure that their charitable dollars only support organizations that have adequate child abuse prevention, education, training, and reporting policies and programs in place.
The Child Safety Pledge asks funders – foundations and individual philanthropists alike – to pledge that they only support Jewish organizations that have adopted and implemented comprehensive policies and procedures to prevent and address the sexual abuse of children. By raising awareness of the need for such policies and procedures, and making them a minimal requirement for organizations to receive funding, we hope to transform the Jewish communal system to take the steps necessary to tackle this issue.
Because despite community-wide outrage at each newly reported incident, there is no mechanism in place to ensure that organizations take the right steps, or for parents or funders to be certain that they have taken those steps. Even with widespread acknowledgement that the issue exists, no single agency can change the broader culture on its own to make sure that Jewish organizations respond adequately.
The immediate objective of the Child Safety Pledge is to encourage funders to make grants and give donations only to those Jewish organizations that have adopted and implemented policies addressing child sexual abuse education, training, prevention, and reporting. The ultimate goal is to create a safer, more transparent, and more accountable environment in Jewish organizations that work with children. The necessary models already exist to do this, and have proven effective in many organizations. The mission now is to make those models universal in the Jewish community.
Because regardless of what type of organization — school, camp, or synagogue — and regardless of movement affiliation — JCCA, B’nei Akiva, URJ, etc. — the one thing that all Jewish organizations have in common is that they depend upon charitable gifts and grants to function. By creating an expectation that organizations comply with certain standards, we can require them to act responsibly or face major impact to their bottom line. The idea is to say simply and directly to organizations seeking funding from institutional grantmakers, philanthropists, and individual donors: “In order to receive any funding from us, your organization must have considered and implemented standards for education, training, prevention, and reporting related to child sexual abuse.”
35 states have adopted “Erin’s Law” which requires that all public schools in each state implement a prevention-oriented child sexual abuse program. One part of that program focuses on teaching school personnel about child sexual abuse and how to spot and prevent it. We believe that the Jewish community would benefit from a similar approach. This would ensure that every Jewish organization that works with children has an appropriate written policy applicable to and understood by all personnel who interact with children, backed up by the necessary actions to implement it. These policies and procedures must address the education, training, and supervision necessary to prevent the sexual abuse of children and deal with it if it occurs.
We recognize that the details of that policy and those procedures will likely differ depending upon what kind of organization is implementing them, and the specific character of the organization, including, but not limited to, movement affiliation, geographical location, mission, constituents, tradition, and organizational values. Our goal is not to create a universal set of standards, but rather to have every funder insist upon the standards the feel are appropriate to garner their support.
We believe that given the breadth and diversity of the Jewish community, trying to create universal standards is neither desirable nor possible. Even if such standards could be created, there is no governing authority to enforce them. That is why we believe a funder pledge is the best strategy to achieve this important goal. By focusing on funders we believe that we can create the conditions where organizations will voluntarily come in line with adequate standards. In fact, the funder pledge creates a competitive incentive for organizations to be pro-active, comprehensive, and vocal about their policies and procedures. This is a market-based approach to solving a vexing communal issue.
Of course it does, and the Child Safety Pledge is that community-wide answer. We believe that making the change we seek cannot happen by fiat or coercion, but rather by a growing communal consensus that it is the right thing to do. Even though the Child Safety Pledge will not have the force of law, we believe that the Jewish community would be well served by working together on this issue. Once the pledge is in place, we hope those who support it, in concert with recognized experts and their community partners, will devise a process to create a framework detailing acceptable policies and procedures for those organizations that may not have the benefit of an umbrella association or convening agency to provide standard guidelines. By working together to confront and address this issue, the Jewish community will demonstrate its seriousness and commitment to change.
The staff and leadership of individual organizations will need to determine the best way to comply with the requirements of the pledge. Organizations with national associations and coordinating bodies, such as movement-affiliated synagogues, JCCs, federations, and many camps likely will turn to central institutions to provide guidance for the organizations they oversee. It will be incumbent upon the parties concerned, both funders and program providers alike, to create and enforce their own standards. We also believe that by catalyzing the conversation, we will help generate momentum for organizations to take action.
Ask them. Before making any kind of contribution or grant to any organization, talk to its leadership and ask to see the written child sexual abuse prevention and reporting policy. Ask them to tell you about the kind of education, training, and supervision they have put in place to prevent and report abuse. If you are not satisfied with the answers, tell them that in order to earn your support they will need to do better.
By using the same oversight procedures that they already use to make sure grantees comply with other aspects of funding requirements. Again, this will differ by funder, and institutional grantmakers such as staffed foundations will likely take the lead in oversight (as they do with other aspects of funding requirements). If an organization is receiving funds from a foundation that has taken the pledge, and the foundation has performed the necessary due diligence to assure compliance, individual donors and philanthropists who have also taken the pledge can give to that organization with confidence.
For those organizations that do not already have adequate measures in place, a funder pledge will push them to take steps that will likely require money, expertise, and staff/volunteer time. We hope that organizations will see this process as an opportunity to engage their stakeholders in a very important conversation, and that those stakeholders will step up to make sure the organizations they care about are in compliance. Likewise, as funders join the Pledge, and start holding the causes they care about to a higher standard, we hope that will inspire the funders to step up with the resources needed for compliance in the organizations they wish to continue supporting. We also hope that the community-wide conversation around the pledge will catalyze funders and organizations to explore innovative approaches to compliance that diffuse and control costs and improve effectiveness.
There are already many resources, both Jewish and non-Jewish, both private and nonprofit, that can help organizations be better prepared. The goal of the Pledge is not just to instigate change, but also to help point organizations in the right direction to get the help they need. Minimally that would include a website with information and links, but ultimately could lead to a network of partners (of organizations and individual consultants) who can be contacted for support – and online and in person training. Because of the diversity of community, and the diversity of needs, the backers of the pledge cannot be in the business of imposing specific sources for this (which would require burdensome oversight and vetting). Rather, the goal is to empower organizations as consumers to seek out the best possible fit for their needs.
If all it takes is an organization asserting that they have adequate policies and procedures, won’t some organizations make the assertion but not back up their words with actions?
That is currently the case with many organizational policies already required by funders and even by U.S. Internal Revenue Code. For example, when a 501(c)(3) files its annual Form 990 tax return, it must assert that it has certain policies in place such as document retention and board of directors conflict of interest policies – even though the IRS doesn’t require proof. Organizations which make false assertions risk consequences from the IRS and funders alike. Many grant agreements require organizations to supply documentation of grant guideline compliance, and funders who take the Pledge will be encouraged to add Child Safety standards to these requirements.
For now we’re asking that you sign a Support Statement for the creation of the Pledge here: Add your name to the list of funders who have already said they are in favor of establishing a Pledge. Once Pledge language is formally adopted, you’ll be invited to sign the Pledge itself, and will be provided with information and resources on how to implement it. Encourage your friends and members of your community to sign the Support Statement, as well as the funding organizations working in your community. The more individuals and organizations signing on, the more momentum and pressure will exist for others to do so as well.
Doesn’t that mean the pledge is entirely dependent upon funders excercising oversight to determine and assure compliance?
At first, yes, because this is a funder-driven strategy the onus is upon funders to do what they feel is necessary to be certain an organization is worthy of their support. But down the road, we envision a multi-tiered compliance regime in which organizations not only assert they have such policies and procedures, but have that assertion verified, and hopefully even accredited by an outside authority. In other words, minimal compliance would mean an organization must affirm it has the policies and procedures in place. Stronger compliance would require verification to funders that those policies and procedures are in place. The strongest compliance would be a certification by an independent entity tasked with investigating and testing the effectiveness of the policies and procedures. Again, funders would determine which level of compliance is required for their funding, but our hope is that in a competitive philanthropic marketplace, organizations would seek the highest level of compliance because funders would demand it.
Jumpstart has been engaged to create a program design to create the stakeholder group and lay the groundwork for the pledge rollout. Jumpstart and its partners have been quietly recruiting select funders and representatives of relevant associations and network organizations to discuss the Pledge and the campaign to support it. The purpose is to build an early adopter coalition in support of a funder pledge (Founding Signatories), and to determine the best process to flesh out the details of the minimum requirements for compliance. A number of individuals have already signed on to a pre-pledge document, and will become Founding Signatories when the public Pledge is launched. The pledge concept was unveiled at the Jewish Funders Network conference in April 2016.
The creation of the stakeholder group and creation of the pledge language is only the first phase of a multi-phase process and focuses on the launch of the strategy. This phase is limited to organizing funders around support for the pledge concept; it does not include creating or—beyond launching the website—managing the broader public campaign to advance it institutionally or a planning process which will result in fully articulated policies. Those details will be determined by the members of the coalition.
The language of the Pledge itself has been crafted by diverse working group with input from experts and community leaders. While it will not impose an exact set of policies and procedures, it will set the framework for them, requiring them to be written, comprehensive, and that they address education, hiring, training, prevention, and reporting. Recognizing the need for advance planning by funders and organizations alike, the Pledge will include an effective date some time after the parameters have been determined and adopted.
Now that the Pledge content has been finalized, members of the coalition are working privately to expand the number of organizations and philanthropists taking the Pledge. Simultaneously, work will proceed to identify the best practices and policies required for compliance with the Pledge. A group of stakeholders ha been identified, invited, and educated about the issue, to craft and take the Pledge, to frame the next steps in policy development, and to map out a public Pledge campaign.
As this process unfolds, the coalition will grow, bringing on new allies and supporters for the campaign. Beyond this initial effort, any successive phases would require additional scoping, expertise, and funding commitments. We hope this process ultimately will include numerous other philanthropic and organizational partners. These new allies will help lead the campaign to draft model policies and launch broader public campaign to encourage their adoption.